d0cd
d0cd
Would it be possible to support this via a generic "library" function?
> Can you make an issue drafting documentation for the constructor and new opcodes, ignoring program upgradability for now: https://github.com/aleoNet/welcome/issues/new @vicsn since we'd like to do updatability all in one...
> @vicsn @d0cd -- pushing back on removing the reservation of keyword `constructor`. > > It is easy to remove the restriction in the future, however it is difficult to...
> The benefits of rushing in a synchronous upgrade are limited, let's add it to [Consensus V6](https://github.com/ProvableHQ/snarkVM/pull/2670) (see the PR description for release dates). @d0cd can you make: > >...
Closed in favor of https://github.com/ProvableHQ/snarkVM/pull/2807
@dantgw Good to merge after the conflicts are resolved!
Minimize exposure of the module structure. pub use when needed.
Can you please include a the command you've typed into the CLI?
When you invoke `transfer_public` in a program, you're spending the program's balance not the users. Devs that aren't aware of this can often introduce bugs into their programs.
It doesn't fix the core issue, but if you adjust the logic so that the assertion isn't trivially false, you should be able to deploy it. One way to do...