czlowiek488
czlowiek488
@jonaslagoni this is even more complex after I intruduced [this issue](https://github.com/asyncapi/generator-model-sdk/issues/194).
Is someone who would like finish and merge this PR? I would like to have this exact feature in my app. I have this file structure. ``` features/ featureName/ actionA/...
@NetanelBasal Support for tree shaking restored :)
@NetanelBasal What about this?
If you wish to add examples for the functions without a json file I see 2 options - add examples manually - add json file to them On the other...
I personally don't think it is a good idea. I wouldn't like to give up control since we don't know what the future brings. If you don't mind I would...
Yeah sure but what's the real cost of maintance of those files? I am not quiet familiar with changes which were introduced here in the past however, from my experience...
Suggested functionality was added. I also changed how the result is showed since it was pretty unreadeble before. Now it look like this: ``` $ ts-node ./scripts/example-generator.js ./packages/falso/src/lib/ Generating examples......
I changed the way script is executed to give more flexability. `./node_modules/.bin/ts-node ./scripts/example-generator.js ./packages/falso/src/lib/ @automaticallyGeneratedExamples`
Tell me if you see more issues to resolve before adding generator indicator to other files.