Çağatay Yücelen

This will be probably a breaking change. `fatih/color` already archived maybe we can just include the whole project to our?

Hi @MarcoAntonioSilveira. I just updated the description with some detail about what are we expecting from this feature. I suggest you to review existing matchers to have an idea about...

You don't need to check if its a valid date or not. Just match for the layout. Validation can be another feature for another issue and can be implemented later.

@MarcoAntonioSilveira looks like time.Stamp matches more than one layouts' parts (i.e. ANSIC, UnixDate, StampMilli, StampMicro, StampNano). I created a new branch `match-timestamp` and added a test for it. Take a...

Lets fix the overlap with StampMilli, StampMicro and Stampnano first. Then we can discuss ANSIC and UnixDate cases whether its a problem or not.

Any updates @MarcoAntonioSilveira, do you need help?

Yes I am experiencing the lag too. Is there any way to overcome from this issue?

Is there any description about this usecase? What will be implemented exactly?

So you need to handle multiple readers concurrently for that feature right? I was using bigqueue for a while and waiting for multithreading support too (It's postponed to v0.5.0 as...

Take your time. It will educatory for me i guess.