cueckoo
cueckoo
_Original reply by @mpvl in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/474#issuecomment-674040620_ Currently, the iteration order is not defined in the spec (unspecified) and thus up to the implementation. In the old implementation, each field name...
_Original reply by @proppy in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/390#issuecomment-630139275_ In: ``` json.Workflow.jobs.#job ``` Where would the #job comes from? (since it wouldn't be defined in the underlying jsonschema). I wonder if `[]`, `[...]`...
_Original reply by @myitcv in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/390#issuecomment-630571776_ > Where would the #job comes from? (since it wouldn't be defined in the underlying jsonschema). It was just a very loose idea to...
_Original reply by @myitcv in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/1018#issuecomment-850477996_ Likely related/identical to https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/1006
_Original reply by @uhthomas in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/1018#issuecomment-850729954_ Looks like it's actually even more common than I had first thought. Take this snippet: ``` // Some comment some_long_key: "some_value" ``` Formatting results...
_Original reply by @myitcv in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/572#issuecomment-831167446_ As of 3ef90b326d489a6bf02c0a9527641fd44ae1c319 still takes ~5s.
_Original reply by @eadlam in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/1058#issuecomment-861625655_ This worked correctly on **v0.4.0-rc.1** but fails on **v0.4.0**.
_Original reply by @mpvl in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/964#issuecomment-838221397_ Same issue as before: definitions are evaluated. So also when running export. So the `#T.valid` field evaluates to false, as the error message says....
_Original reply by @mpvl in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/964#issuecomment-838224143_ Note that Proposal #822 introduces a concept of required fields, allowing to state explicitly that a field must have a concrete value. Is this...
_Original reply by @kumorid in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/964#issuecomment-838824620_ First things first. > What exactly is it what you try to do here? One could just write: What I presented is a simplification...