cueckoo

_Original reply by @mpvl in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/745#issuecomment-780523037_ Would it be useful to have a semantic diff? There is an internal diff package in the CUE, but we could expose it as...

_Original reply by @vikstrous2 in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/745#issuecomment-816727642_ I'll comment on #8 because that's closer to my use case.

_Original reply by @tredoe in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/6#issuecomment-531558455_ This would be a great feature. At my case, I'm exporting the Cue file to Json, for then to use 'jsonutil' (https://github.com/bashtian/jsonutils) to generate...

_Original reply by @mpvl in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/6#issuecomment-533715260_ Thanks for your kind words. Interesting, I expected the code generation aspect would be more desirable. So note that in the mean time there...

_Original reply by @jlongtine in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/69#issuecomment-516921341_ @matthewmueller I think _some_ work has been done on Protobuf: https://github.com/cuelang/cue/tree/master/encoding/protobuf @mpvl would have a better idea of the state of that code, though.

_Original reply by @mpvl in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/69#issuecomment-517227475_ @matthewmueller This is not planned at the moment, although I have given it some thought. The main reason not though is that I didn't...

_Original reply by @mpvl in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/69#issuecomment-533706195_ @matthewmueller if you have a concrete example of how you would want to be using CUE this way I would be quite interested.

_Original reply by @matthewmueller in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/69#issuecomment-533729137_ Hey @mpvl! I'm imagining an implementation of protobuf's generators that adds constraint-based validation. Tons of unknowns here, but conceptually I was thinking something like...

_Original reply by @mpvl in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/69#issuecomment-739228231_ Just to add some thoughts here: with the upcoming proposal to generalize and harmonize the syntax, something that gets close to the above rpc...

_Original reply by @verdverm in https://github.com/cuelang/cue/issues/69#issuecomment-739412692_ I'm in favor of the `() :: ()` syntax for its visual standout properties. This will help with readability, especially when I revisit code...