David Stes

Oops ... looks like a duplicate of https://github.com/AlecAivazis/survey/pull/372

I just logged a similar issue for OpenIndiana

For what it's worth, I think that if those primitives 54 and 554 fail sometimes, then they can perhaps be added in a Test framework (perhaps those Tests were already...

I checked the Float-tests (Kernel-Numbers) in Squeak6.0alpha-19793-64bit.image. I don't immediately see in the Test framework whether there is a Squeak test, equivalent to the tests for this issue. Is it...

No I didn't run tests but I installed the package and tested some simple calculatoins. Also I tested the readline editi mode and support. So I did manual testing of...

The process to automatically apply patch 09-sqUnixSpurMemory.patch is NOT a "pain in the butt" because it has been used for 2 years automatically : apply the patch prior to build...

By the way, I started to see the error ` sqAllocateMemory: initial alloc failed!` and ``` sqAllocateMemorySegmentOfSizeAboveAllocatedSizeInto mmap: Not enough space sqAllocateMemory: initial alloc failed! ``` around the time in...

In private email , I have received confirmation from Eliot Miranda (at least by email) that this patch would be added "this week", but that was already many weeks or...

Thanks for the feedback. I am willing to submit a pull request to the opensmalltalk-vm sources but I think raising an issue is more appropriate because I don't fully understand...

Hi, I've changed the title of the issue to "sbrk() saUnixSpurMemory patch" as the error that is raised : mmap() initialAlloc failed made me think at first that this is...