Simon Adorf

> > I guess at the moment, there is no longer any "running on someone else's computer" in the tutorial. > > I think this is one of the strengths...

> @csadorf if this doesn't require a second cluster, is it also some that _could_ be set up on the AiiDAlab demo cluster? I am not sure, we will have...

> They were interested in better integrating with sacred, so it might be good to have them onboard when working out the next version of the database format. Would you...

I see two main challenges in solving this problem: 1. There is no concept of data persistence in sacred. 2. There is no concept of workflow lineage or dependency in...

This issue is leading to very confusing questionnaire behavior. Would it be possible to up the priority? Especially because it is user-facing?

> We have validators now in 6.2. Have you tried with those? I had not, thank you for pointing this out. This does constitute a viable work-around for the problem.

> @wphicks Regarding `This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.` > > What more should I do to make this go away? I...

I think it should say `get_structure_data()`, because the corresponding class is called `StructureData`.

/ok to test

/ok to test