Eugene Crosser
Eugene Crosser
Could we please have a tagged release with this commit @svinota ? Thanks!
That's right, you need to subscribe to `RTMGRP_LINK` and remove all routes with `oif` matching the disappearing link. At least, that's what we are doing, and it seems to work.
We did not run into this use case (yet?), and not handling it.
@svenauhagen your test case looks odd to me. The last command is `ip r d 172.16.1.1/24 dev veth1`, should it be `ip a d 172.16.1.1/24 dev veth1`?
> How do we get to a situation where a l3vni doesn't have a label? That seems to be the problem right? I'd like to fix that... Unfortunately I do...
I made a low cost effort to tell autoconf to not define `BFD_LINUX`, in the hope that UDP code will be used instead. But it did not seem to work....
This is not an error. This is the way kernel tells userspace that they need to re-request the dump. So you need to wrap your request in a retry loop.
I can confirm that the change helps. I backported the commit to 10.1.1. With running bfdd, creating 250 VRFs does not produce noticeable impact on the network throughput. Thanks @rzalamena...
> While this is okay, can we have a separate topotest instead of replacing this one (non peer-group...)? I actually started by making a copy of the test in a...
> Create a new test_XXXX.py in the same directory. Have it setup slightly differently but all the same code put into a XXX_common.py ( Look at what was done in...