katelyn martin
katelyn martin
> We should assign this during sprint planning @cratelyn ah. it sounds like this shouldn't be included in this sprint! pardon the noise. :+1:
@hdevalence i prepared a scaffold in #3958, taking a small preparatory step towards using `MockClient` with `Planner::plan()`.
#3896 is loosely related to this work.
#4081 has been fixed by #4312, so i am planning to pick this work back up.
> we want to be able to test certain scenarios where one val get tombstoned, so two validators are sufficient (i think four came from talking about 3f+1) update from...
once i land #3996, i'll be putting this work down for a few days to focus on #3995.
marking as blocked until work restructuring the planner has landed. (_see #4141, #4081_)
this branch has been dormant for a few months. in that time, #3996 front-ran the code motion related to the grpc endpoint, and the `mock_consensus.rs` file was decomposed into distinct...
x-ref #4152.
`Address` is mentioned in the description, i would be interested in handling that as well this week.