David Conran

I'll look into improving the matching. You'll need to workout the checksum part/calculation as that will be critical to getting this supported. I suggest you focus on working out how...

> I'll work on it, do you have any guess or other protocols which does a similar control bits? See/read: https://github.com/crankyoldgit/IRremoteESP8266/wiki/Adding-support-for-a-new-AC-protocol#integrity-checks

Unless a lot of the bits line up the same, I wouldn't bother with inheritance.

Something is screwing around with the timing system. i.e. The pulses produced are not as they should be. This is probably due to the Wifi operating in the background while...

Looking into this more, it seems the S2 being a single processor is more susceptable to causing delays in bit-banging (which is what we are doing to generate a PWM...

If it is dual core (2 CPUs) then you'll probably be fine

> aren't all esp32's dual core ? No. e.g. The ESP32-S2 is a single core, hence why we are have an issue on that platform when the CPU needs to...

It seems the only way to solve it on that architecture is for us to re-write the sending routines to use the [`rmt` feature/library](https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/latest/esp32/api-reference/peripherals/rmt.html). The library doesn't use or support...

It is something I want to do, but I just don't have the spare time or have a great enough need at present. I think there have been attemps/forks to...

> irsend.sendRaw(rawData, sizeof(rawData)/2, 38); First of all, I'm assuming the issues (crashes/failures) you are having are with the fork, not the release branch. I'm not sure your code `sizeof(rawData)/2` does...