Daniel McCarney
Daniel McCarney
> Are you guys are okay with nurturing a newbie? I would be happy to help you work through the above if you're still interested. You can find us [in...
I think we can call this done! Thanks again for the great work.
:wave: Hi @mspi21, thanks for opening an issue. This sounds like an interesting/worthwhile idea. Would you be interested in trying to make a checklist of the requirements and checking off...
> At the moment, I am primarily focusing on finishing my thesis Understood :-) Best of luck finishing that up.
Thank you! I will review this shortly and see if I can fill in any of the TODOs/gaps. I appreciate you digging in.
@mspi21 This was very helpful, thanks again. I think 99% of your answers are spot on. It's validating to see that Rustls has already implemented the majority of these best...
I've submitted our application.
Thanks for filing this issue. It sounds interesting and having a repro is a big help (even if its on the larger side). I won't have a chance to investigate...
If the goal is to make something like https://github.com/rustls/tokio-rustls/issues/54 easier I don't know that this meaningfully shifts the needle. Maybe it should be something higher-level in the acceptor API specifically...
> Maybe take_plaintext() -> Option, which can be called before accept() and does minimal checking if the buffered bytes look like TLS? Yeah! Admittedly I haven't tried sketching anything out...