Dmitriy Kalinin
Dmitriy Kalinin
cc @tylerschultz
@mtekel yup looks like a bug. should be instance group's name.
@schmidtsv dont really have a date at this point. we are trying to get to this in the next 2-3 months.
@allomov unfortunately not all CPIs define that property, so we cant really rely that `agent.mbus` is there. may be make that check conditional on the property presence?
@allomov yup that one is required.
@allomov Cool. Thanks.
I am somewhat conflicted about exposing CID as a user input since it's something that CPI defines/uses internally - it's not necessarily just the ID in the IaaS. Also question...
We are planning to add some kind of types for the properties. I have not had a chance to write something up yet. Imho there are several common high level...
I've finally collected my notes and pushed https://github.com/cloudfoundry/bosh-notes/commit/5301f6fa4c8f73b20337900b95a0a5f63d20bb3a. Hopefully that gives you an idea of what I'm currently planning. And to answer your questions above: > 1. do you plan...
Once registry removed this would not be a problem. Before we tell people to use this as a replacement to bosh micro we will change such that registry port is...