Phillip Cloud
Phillip Cloud
@timothydijamco Are you planning to get to this before 3.1? We'd like to release in a week or two.
@timothydijamco Any chance you might be able to wrap this up for 3.2? If not, it'll go into 4.0!
@emilyreff7 Is there a behavior change here, or is this an internal refactoring with no user facing API changes?
This was addressed in the recent merge of `4.x.x` to `master` #4512.
I don't think this is strictly a bug, since it doesn't affect correctness. SQL will be uglier and the pandas/dask backends will probably do some unnecessary computation, but I don't...
@mharrisb1 This is a really great proposal. I'll go in reverse order to get the easier bits out of the way first. Let's dive in. ## Preliminaries It'd be great...
@mharrisb1 Thoughts here? I know @saulpw has been thinking about DDL-in-ibis recently and likely also has some thoughts here.
@brendanbikes Thanks for the issue. I'll take a closer look at this today and see if there's a straightforward way to fix the problem. Really appreciate the MWE!
I looked into this, and the problem is more challenging than it may appear. We'll need to change the internal representation of join operations to be variadic so I'm going...
@kszucs Can we close this out?