Tatu Saloranta
Tatu Saloranta
I could specify use of `LinkedHashSet` I suppose; although if there is parallel method that takes in `Set` to add entries to, caller could enforce particular ordering. But it almost...
I meant traversal of resolved super types, to get the collection in exact order caller wants -- versus just getting a Set/Collection of super types in arbitrary order. I can...
Heh. Yeah, just wanted to make sure. I can see benefit of stable ordering, but now that I think of this, I am not sure how stable it can be....
@kaqqao Sounds reasonable, just need to figure out where to put that in an API, and whether to do "same or supertype" or strict "is supertype", as well as combinations...
@krzysiekbielicki Thank you for contributing this! I hope to check out PR soon but have a few things queued up -- but I wanted to add a note to say...
Ah, right. So as implemented the method does not include types recursively, but only immediate parent. So yes, that should be added; at least I don't see as much value...
Hmmh. I think this was a tricky area, and my immediate thinking is that all array types only really extended `Object`, so that `Long[]` does not have `Number[]` as its...
@zdenek-biberle I agree, it would seem to me that the declaration from `B` should have precedence here.
@meszibalu Thank you for reporting this. It may take a while for me to look into this but just adding a note to mention I saw this. I am not...
Hmmh. I don't think I agree here -- I don't see why both `private` methods should be reported. What would be use case for doing that? If you want to...