Tatu Saloranta
Tatu Saloranta
Not loving replicating of subset of `BeanDeserializer` but apparently less complex than alternatives.
2.15.4 is not the latest so please make sure to verify with 2.17.2 or 2.18.0-rc1. Ideally before filing issue :) Also looks like reproduction is in Kotlin so I may...
Cannot reproduce: would need changes requested to re-open or re-file.
While we can leave this issue open, I do not think we will be pursuing anything like this: existing options can be improved but I really do not want to...
Subtypes should not try to override `@JsonTypeInfo`: this is not supported functionality. And as such, results of trying to do that are undefined. So... I don't think there's necessarily bug...
@wesleyking0 I do not think this is something that should be done, ever. I am ok leaving this open, but currently disagree with the idea fundamentally.
@JooHyukKim Sorry, been swamped with introspection bug fixes; this is still on my todo list to review soon. :)
Ok, so added a note on issue: I think we have to add a feature (probably `MapperFeature`) to allow opt-in of this functionality since it seems to have backwards compatibility...
Ok; I can see how RFE for "avoid setting unwrapper object if no properties were found" makes sense, and may be possible to implement. Part about setter is interesting --...
Yes, how dare people not implement things you want, @marcusvoltolim. What is world coming to. How dare they.