Tatu Saloranta

FWTW, #5006 added `MapperFeature.REQUIRE_HANDLERS_FOR_JAVA8_OPTIONALS` for `java.util.Optional` the same way. So if anyone had time & interest to copy that approach that could still make it in 2.19.0 release... Granted, this...

Fixed via #5105 by adding `MapperFeature.REQUIRE_HANDLERS_FOR_JAVA8_TIMES`. Might not be exactly what requested but hopefully helpful for some users.

Ok. Looks like possible bug, although usage is bit odd -- if 0-args Constructor is expected to be used (I think?), how should `age` be passed? Also, instead of System.out.println(user);...

Trying to figure this out. One big conceptual/modeling problem is that 0-param "default" constructors (alas, overloaded term) are NOT included in regular declared constructors List, but as separate things. Changing...

Ok: was able to fix. Note tho that when using 0-param Constructor, "age" has to be passed some other way (or ignored) -- I modified test to use empty Object....

Could you please describe what is the goal here; why is the addition needed?

@hurelhuyag Ok, typically all PRs should have descriptions explaining the rationale which is why I asked. So it's to add verification of working (or not as the case is) of...

@hurelhuyag Yes but I will not merge changes to CI that would prevent "all green". So verification can only be added to main workflow when it passes. I would be...

First things first: it would be good to verify that the issue still occurs in 2.17.2 as 2.15 is not the latest release. I suspect it does but it'd be...

Thank you @yacine-pc . I am not sure if this can be fixed or not (and won't necessarily have time to dig in deep in near future). In the meantime...