coryrc
coryrc
## Data Here are my modeled and measured dimensions with `$fn=48`: | Modeled | Horizontal Hole ID | Vertical Hole ID | Vertical Cyl OD | Horizontal Diamond Side |...
> is your printer really so bad that you get a snug fit on the tester with $slop=0.22? Why would overextrusion be different for circles than squares? Unless the tight...
> Perhaps you avoid absolute statements about the behavior of holes---maybe other printers are different than yours---but draw attention to the possibility that things could get messy when the holes...
Up to you, I still plan to make the changes. Here's my updates so far: 1. I made a different slop tester to avoid bulging corners and scaled it down...
> The concept of making a hole with plastic that can be screwed into with a metal bolt, having its threads biting into the plastic, is _not_ (AFAIK) addressed by...
I printed an M7 buttress screw and nut to meet actual standards diameter for "standard" tolerance as if `2*$slop` was being used (instead of `4*$slop`). [0] The screw works; being...
> No, 2*$slop does not follow the guidance. Or rather, it follows the guidance assuming you want a "snug" fit, which would mean that the parts don't turn easily. As...
In almost all cases `4*$slop` "works", in that using the matching nut and screw from `screws.scad` will mate, but will get proportionally tighter as diameter increases (hence why `4*$slop` worked...
Essentially a dupe of #8261
Do any of the experimental features need to be made official and/or completely removed before cutting a stable release?