Donghee Na
My personal suggestion is targeting HPy instead of C API itself, C API expose too much of implementation detail from CPython. https://hpyproject.org/
FYI, GraalPython and PyPy success to support HPy
(By the way, long time no see people)
@mpage Looks like you should resolve the conflict before Ken merges this PR.
> If we have a 1000 threads could we get a 1000 copies of the bytecode? (Comment about general approach) Even if that is true, I can not see any...
@flowdas Out of curiosity and just for clear is there any reason not to use trensifex?
cc @darjeeling
Hi Victor, SC now publishes [the acceptance](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-782-add-pybyteswriter-c-api/86617/15) of this PEP. Congratulations! Warm regards, Donghee (on behalf of the Python Steering Council)
I am not sure if we have to add notes to all list-related APIs, but for me, this note looks more straightforward from the user side.
@vstinner cc @colesbury Victor, if you are thinking about the comment that you wrote before. https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/121403#issuecomment-2214035566 So, how can we list all available APIs even if the list is not...