Matt

containsInAnyOrder is entirely different from contains or containsAll for lists (as mentioned in https://github.com/npryce/hamkrest/issues/37) - So I would suggest calling it containsInAnyOrder as per hamcrest.

Although I haven't used the testify library, I do not think we could use `gocrest` matchers out of the box for the `mock.MatchedBy` method - the testify code would probably...

Thanks for your idea. I think this would be fine. You could implement it as a wrapper around `is.not(is.nil())`. Go for it 👍 Edit: it might be better as `has.NoError()`

There's just no need for that 100%, just remove it..

Hey The same crash text is in the [hs_err log attached](https://github.com/ajalt/mordant/files/10548151/hs_err_pid22892.log) I think. If that doesn't help I'll post it when I get back to my laptop tomorrow 👍

On the HotSpot JVM the crash is as follows: ``` # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x000000014754ac14, pid=75088,...

Possibly related? https://github.com/jline/jline3/issues/688 - there are several linked issues that might be worth reading about. I do use JLine (v3.22.0), but not to discover or update anything regarding the size...

@ajalt Naive testing suggests that this has worked to fix the crash. However, changing the term size doesn't affect the numbers in the column. At least the size does not...

not sure what I was thinking here, cause it makes no sense for anyOf to fail matching less than all - its criteria is to match ANY of the matchers...

myBlah isn't being declared as a pointer in your example, its a value. `is.NilPtr` only works on pointers declared with `*`. The test should be: ``` func TestShouldHaveANilBlah(t *testing.T) {...