Fabian
Fabian
Fundamentally this change is fine, but I think we leave the current behavior configurable (personally, I prefer the current behavior). This seems to break some things, in particular (from type-linter-test.ml):...
This change and the mechanism to configure it looks good. However, it causes some problems with the highlighting of number literals (highlighted as error across the [type-linter-test.ml](https://github.com/ocaml/vim-ocaml/blob/master/type-linter-test.ml) file), the `fun`...
Thanks! Super-minor, but it still removes the type highlighting from the following (on the int): ```ocaml type t (*c*) = int ```
This comment from @Maelan looks relevant: https://github.com/ocaml/vim-ocaml/pull/81#discussion_r924975501
The latest commit seems to have broken the highlighting of identifiers in some places (e.g. the `f` in line 49 is recognized as a type). You can use `:TOhtml` and...
On the last commit (817e8f75a8d1324b2d28c0958534a742656d8350), some highlights are still incorrect (e.g. the `let f` on line 49), and show up in the diff.
I do think this is the right way forward, since it also fixes several oddities that vim users come across every now and then: - merlin (at least via ale)...
This is fixed in master, let's ping @MassD to ask for a new release.
The bzimage format is somewhat documented here (you can probably learn more by reading v86 or kernel sources): https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/x86/boot.txt As already mentioned, multiboot is another format that should work in...