collerek
collerek
Hi @gvbgduh will you proceed with this issue as you described in #150?
It might be related to #139. I know that in some cases when you pass parameters outside of columns scope (like where clause or order clause) databases passes all values...
For inline comments you don't need the ending `--` which indicates another comment. I think we stopped removing new lines markers so would expect this to come from `sqlparse`.
@macbre how do you see this? For me it's more an enhancement than a bug as this use of `values` is a generative function like the ones described in #166...
For now, only column defining subqueries and join subqueries are supported -> so resolving subqueries in where clause it's an enhancement. As for the column names right now we do...
What do you mean by alias resolving? We have a bug that you reported (multiple aliases without as in from clause) Apart from this if you provide the prefix for...
If there is no prefix the column name has to be unique in the scope of the query -> which means that you should be able to resolve it with...
From what I see this also is related to redundant brackets (i.e. in first query you have ` from ( (` with double brackets. We will try to fix this,...
Currently, we don't infer the table if you do not provide it (or alias of it) in a query as this would work only for the selects from a single...
I think we support it if you just use `*`, i think we don't support ones with prefix as of now (like `prefix.*`).