Christian Clason

> Though if we clearly advertise it as "best effort"/"community supported", we can probably get away with a lower maintenance burden I would advise against this, since this would lower...

Also, since it's not been mentioned so far: 1. Neovim has no robust way of actually displaying icons, so this proposal boils down to "Neovim should take care of maintaining...

> This proposal boils down to the title of "Better built-in support for icons". But the proposal is much stronger, given that we have _no_ support for icons. So the...

I reproduced this with the latest `master`. Not sure this is in any way related to tree-sitter CLI, though, as the offending process is `clang-19` (so emscripten). Of course, it's...

Yes. `tree-sitter generate --no-bindings && tree-sitter build --wasm` from today's latest commit. Still, the first order of business is always to blame LLVM.

Related Vim PR (with partial libvterm support which we haven't cherry-picked yet): https://github.com/vim/vim/pull/8365

Can you please separate functional grammar changes from binding noise?

And I'd prefer such changes to be made _after_ the feature is merged and stabilized. I don't want a stable parser (which this is, since Neovim relies on it) tracking...

> There was a mishap during rebasing. It's all supposed to be in a separate commit. I mean separate PRs so I can review and merge them individually. > They...

Closing since most of the changes (except for the bindings) have already been included individually. Binding update should be a separate PR anyway.