Claudio Gomboli

Should it be a variant of the table pattern? So that we can pick one or the other case by case.

Yes sorry I meant a variant implementation wise, e.g. class name, so that we can set which one we want to use every time.

To be planned for later iterations

WG: accessibility consideration to consider: https://amberwilson.co.uk/blog/are-your-anchor-links-accessible/#contents

WG: we decided to update the + and - icons in squares with the new icons: https://vanillaframework.io/docs/examples/patterns/icons/icons-light chevron within squares.

WG: moving to dev and eventually QA design wise

Thanks @nottrobin, yes I think we need to add Figma in this form https://canonical-web-and-design.github.io/practices/workflow/UX-and-design-proposals.html @elioqoshi, to start with. CC @amylily1011 as we talked about updating them. Moving to Discourse would...

Thanks @jamesbeedy I forwarded this feature request to the CharmHub.io repo. I think the Snapcraft-like publishing experience will allow to do this in the new CharmHub, but I will discuss...

As mentioned in the Charm Hub repo issue about this feature request: "This is handled by the store. If not when it comes out, this should be reopened and considered...

@hatched is this still relevant? WG couldn't think of a valid use-case to have a modal without a title.