Christian Kastner

Apologies, it appears that I tested this with Debian stable's 0.7.4 instead of 1.0.0 I had installed on another system. May I suggest a short one-line modification to `usbguard-rules.conf.5.adoc`? I'd...

@adam-waldenberg @jpwhite3 as the maintainer of the package in the official Debian archive, I'd wholeheartedly support a switch to Python3. As of Debian 11, Python2 is generally no longer installed...

I forgot to mention the most important thing: the Debian version has already been ported to Python3; you can find the patch [here](https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/gitinspector/-/blob/debian/master/debian/patches/port-to-python3.patch). I believe this was done using 2to3....

As a data point: in Debian, we have been shipping the Python 3 version of the bindings since 2015, and we haven't had any issues with it so far.

Debian would also like to ask for a tagged release, as we're packaging CK as a dependency of MIOpen.

> Many tests are written assuming that the backends are linked statically and are not compatible with `GGML_BACKEND_DL`. > The way to deal with this and support dynamically loadable backends...

>That's great and that's exactly the way it is intended to be used, so you are absolutely on the right path. However I feel that we need to polish some...

> Can you give me more details about the issues that you are seeing in other systems? GGML_CPU_ALL_VARIANTS is only supported on x64 at the moment, but GGML_BACKEND_DL should still...

> Can I ask what examples or projects that do not support GGML_BACKEND_DL are you interested in packaging? I didn't have anything specific in mind, in fact I have zero...

Ah, now I see it. Thanks.