Jiri Cincura ↹

@Igor-9309 Your problem is unrelated. The `10053` (similar to `10054`) error is "normal" error that you should handle.

@Igor-9309 If you're not handling that case, then yes.

@maumar I'll take a look at it.

Please upgrade `AbsoluteTimer.Tests.csproj` to new format as well.

@JanKrivanek PTAL, thanks.

There's a bunch of other places where the `null` comparison is used for `PerHeapHistories`. Worth changing it in all places? Also, I guess, because it's never `null`, the `?.` is...

@brianrob Do you agree with the change to have the collection lazily initialized?

Not sure what you're asking. But you see the name of failing test(s) and with that you can check the code easily.

Could you please modify the `ReadRow` directly, so it's easier to see the diff. We don't have to keep the original version.

You should modify this PR, preferably.