CL Fisher
CL Fisher
@Learningstuff98 Played around with it a bit -- If you look at line 69-ish It seems like what's happening is it's not showing the last alphabetically? Which would normally speak...
Right... and it's losing the last alphabetically because for testing the # of things on the page is set to 3, right? Right, and you end up with that Default...
Having all the defaults have the word "DEFAULT" in them is where the problem "really" is here, IMO. If you go back to before my initial suggestion before the bank,...
Bleah. Other tests are relying on that name being DEFAULT.
@Learningstuff98 Well, it's terribly terribly kludgey, and I don't like it one bit, but what if your nonsense bank names are all before "DEFAULT", *and* we'll put in a technical...
@Learningstuff98 I think we should test the pagination. The flaw in the setup of defaults is a separate newly discovered issue that has been colliding with this.
Background for whoever is reviewing (probably @dorner) -- @callmarx is new to open source but experienced in Ruby - I suggested doing a partial on this as a Good First...
@Learningstuff98 Have you put up your latest (with the change)?
@LearningStuff98. S'alright - one of us can take it forward. I'll add it to my mental list of TTD.