chuckyvt
chuckyvt
I looked at the original pull request referenced above. It added format specifier to both write and read, which were both list directed at the time. Specifying a write format...
I should point out that this was tested in Ifort/Ifx as of 2023.1. I can't speak to other compilers.
Was able to clean up intent declarations on a number of routines and get the 'pure' flag added to them. But wasn't able to get past line 81 in the...
Ok, this should be complete. Also added a line to the loadtxt example.
Note the following thread on the Fortran discourse has some similarities to this issues, however not sure they are related. https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/why-am-i-getting-an-error-with-list-directed-read/8562
I believe all requested changes in. I did do some prelim benchmarking. It appeared that mapping data may be slightly faster with this approach. (which makes sense to me, it...
First of all, should note this is on Windows, with Intel IFX 2024.1 compiler in CMake Release mode. I went through and ran the updated open and chaining test programs...
Also, I have tried everything I can think of to get the one Windows CI 32 Bit GFortran build to run reliably, but no luck. It fails on the set_other_data...
> @jvdp1 @chuckyvt the use of `class(*), allocatable` is to enable hashing of any derived types beyond the standard intrinsics, so, I believe that removal of `other_type` would introduce a...
I've run out of idea to fix the 32-bit Windows CI failure, as I've tried everything I can think of. I do believe it's a compiler bug as I have...