Chrono
Chrono
There are some IPv6 test cases that are still pending, Let's fix them in other PR.
> Instead of using a pool, we could just reuse the same table all the time. Yes, it is true, but we still need to clear items in the reused...
> I agree with @Suika-Kong , seems some long-lived tables is cleaner, we can just do `table.clear` instead of `release_table`, how do you think @chronolaw ? OK, I will reimplement...
Due to #9211, now this PR seems unnecessary.
We close this PR for now.
We should localize `string.find` and `string.sub`
Common code style issue: add blank line before `else/elseif`, please refer to code style guide.
> > Common code style issue: add blank line before `else/elseif`, please refer to code style guide. > > Just moving those functions to CE and didn't aware of this....
The current code seems to work well, I think this PR is not urgent and we can discuss it after 3.0 release.
很久不写具体的算法了，难免有错误，不过因为是demo，没时间去细看，如果确定有错误可以提PR，多谢。