Christian Brabandt

I would also think TextChangedI should be triggered regardless, because the text changed (even so it was back to the original text)

I think it looks quite good already. I left a few comments, mainly style related. I'll check your detailed questions for Reviewers later.

Okay, the following: > :drop https://github.com/maintainers - Would you ... like to add [!] to this command so 'stickybuf' can be forced? or split a new window? I think `:drop`...

> I think @bfrg's name is good - there is already winfixheight and winfixwidth. Okay, then let's go with this please

> The first note says to do what :make does (which as you correctly guessed errors out). Which in effect means 'Let's move all/most of the "Allow Command But Don't...

There are couple of checks for 'winfixbuf' that are not tested. Can you please try to address those if feasible? Otherwise I think this looks quite good already.

okay, thanks no worries. In that case it is probably fine. Not sure what problem codecov has. Please just consolidate the checks and I'll check it once more time later...

thanks. I'll check it out this weekend. > I was thinking of moving gf & gF to Auto-Find/Create 'nostickybuf' Window instead I think it is fine to fail it. We...

Thanks. I have made a few minor style changes and included it as of 9.1.0147. Thanks for all your work!

yeah, we may need to amend the documentation, that because of E36 WinNew may not be triggered.