J Farkas
J Farkas
Just to reitarate, 22 of the packages documented on https://libguestfs.org/ are no longer actually part of the shipped void libguestfs package. libguestfs-tools may be "new" but all it contains is...
> We generally use upstream names, anything wrong with using `guestfs-tools`? Even the internal library common to `libguestfs` and `guestfs-tools` is residing in `libguestfs-common`. Perhaps the vendor name was chosen...
Of course I'm not quite sure if the choice of the non-upstream package name `libguestfs-tools` is correct. However, when trying to find out where did `virt-sysprep` (for example) has gone...
Yes, I'd still like to have this merged - give me some time to review recent changes
still working on getting back on my feet and retesting this package, appreciate the patience
> Also if you look at `install-man`: > > ``` > 58 if [ -f $(PREFIX)$(binndir)/man8 ]; then \ > 59 rm -f $(PREFIX)$(bindir)/man8; \ > 60 fi > ```...
> On FreeBSD prefix for non-base packages is also `/usr/local` the same as on macOS BSD mentioned by @valentinpy. > > This hardcoded `/usr` prefix is really problematic, because even...