chetmurthy

BTW, obviously I don't -depend- on this behaviour. I just need to ensure that my unit-tests work with `ppx_deriving` as identically as possible, as with my own PPX type-deriving infrastructure.

I had need of parallel {CSR matrix} x { dense vector} mult, so I coded it using rayon. It was .... a nice speedup. Um, I'm [ETA: NOT] sufficiently experienced...

I've started down this road myself, for a project I'm working on. If anybody else is sufficiently interested, I can put the code into a repo and publish it. I'm...

And of course, if you want to move such support into sprs, that'd be fine too. I only suggest putting it in a repo as a way to facilitate sharing...

oops, I forgot you'd opened an issue on this. python interface for sprs: https://github.com/sparsemat/sprs/issues/315

Hi, have you had a chance to think about how we might make progress on a python wrapper? I threw the thing I wrote onto github, but have somewhat stopped...

@muralisrini can you please find me tomorrow to discuss this issue, and also the other issue wherein it seems tha ttrans both successful and failed, are being added to the...

Two thoughts: 1. true enough, but you're suggesting a larger change in the way people write codes in this domain, where this issue is just trying to accelerate the codes...

I *am* curious how one might apply matrix-free methods to computing sparse-matrix x dense-vector product. Musing on it, it seems like, you want to compute each row sparsely, which means...

Hamamura-san, 1. Indeed, I first rustified that line, and it was worth a speedup. But you still construct massive matrices for each Pauli string, only to "add them up" to...