Charlie Haley
Charlie Haley
Hey @deadprogram could you trigger the tests again/review this PR? I believe the failure was a transient issue
> This actually solves issue #2583. I think it should be properly discussed there as the API result of solving this issue should propagate to other targets. > > What...
Sorry for the slow response to this PR, other things have been getting in the way! I've updated the PR with the feedback, I was unsure on where to put...
> Perhaps a better question is: why do we need this at all? I think the main reason people want a function like `PWMForPin()` is because it is currently difficult...
Thanks for the PR @AlexanderBrevig, looks good to me, could you please update your branch?
Hi @davidlundy, thanks for the PR! It looks like the behaviour of the `Gateway` resource namespace has changed since this PR was created, it now has its own override in...
Hi @kahirokunn, thanks for the PR, I've left a couple suggestions on the property in the `values.yaml`, if you could take a look, thanks!
This is an upstream kernel issue, there's some more info here https://github.com/NVIDIA/open-gpu-kernel-modules/issues/256
> I guess the nVidia issue is not related to my Surface Pro 7 with only integrated Intel graphics. Ah sorry, I missed that part, I had a similar issue...
> Hello wave :) > > I don't see yet a warning for the deprecated field usage. But since this is a WIP I assume you'll just add that later?...