Results 43 comments of

Will it be implemented? I am looking forward to this

> 看 quickstart ,没有创建配置文件 > [#24 (comment)](https://github.com/zhengcx/MethodTraceMan/issues/24#issuecomment-558456573) 当我关闭插桩后 ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/58068445/71636578-24e0ef80-2c6d-11ea-8377-caf40778cbd5.png) 编译的 apk 中不含任何 dex

> 近期解决下这个问题,可以关注一下 `traceManConfig.open` 的判断应该在 `registerTransform` 前更合适吧

@elizarov Should it be added to core? I currently need to merge the values of each emission, or is there a better way?

> @RinOrz You can use this implementation for now -> [#1767 (comment)](https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlinx.coroutines/issues/1767#issuecomment-577158308) Yes, I am currently doing this, I mean it might be added to the coroutine core, maybe it...

> This would cause a huge increase in file size if you add something like this to every function, there are much more effective flow obfuscation methods that do not...

> That example doesnt look too bad, however I think its doing something else which is just jump replacement, here is a sample I wrote: > [obftest-obf.jar.zip](https://github.com/superblaubeere27/obfuscator/files/4528742/obftest-obf.jar.zip) > It isnt...

> Well its not in sb's obfuscator thats in my obfuscator but @superblaubeere27 could probably implement something similar It's a pity...is your obfuscator public?

> https://binclub.dev it’s not public yet ok, thx!

> The problem is that you are using a library in your plugin that seems to have been compiled with a pre-release Kotlin compiler - libs.square.kotlinpoet. And you expose types...