Colin Decker
Colin Decker
Yes, it does look like these are tests that could be flaky. I think it's unlikely that we're going try to do anything about that, though.
Yes, it does look like these are tests that could be flaky. Some tests like these are more or less necessarily flaky. In some cases there are ways of making...
@jonahgreenthal Class assignment most likely.
It's not something we have time to prioritize because it's not something that causes us a problem; our internal CI is pretty good about understanding test flakiness and dealing with...
Is there a particular reason you want these made public? I'm not necessarily opposed, but it would mean having a mix of public `MediaType` and `String` constants in the class,...
From what I can tell, the attempt to fix this in commit bb5673f60ce9dcda1c228b0d0e2ce2485468f965 didn't work. I tried the sample program provided and am still seeing the issue. I'm looking into...
So, the `count != 0` check doesn't seem to have any bearing on the behavior here, because the `count` being incremented is only an indicator that the loaded value has...
I've got a solution in the works... it looks like it's not TOO invasive to make blocking gets only return after the value has been stored.
I think it's unlikely we'll fix this at this point, though if someone wants to contribute a fix we'd be happy to look at that. Note that we recommend people...
I believe that due to some weirdness with the GWT setup, you need to first install without running tests (`-DskipTests=true`), after which running tests should work. Perhaps this should be...