Cosimo Damiano Prete

> Is this correct? Yes, but please bear in mind it applies to the other types as well. I never specified I have an issue with `Instant` only. I provided...

> My interest right now is to make sure the ask is understood so someone can work on this. I don't think I have to work on implementation itself, considering...

> Only manually tho, not via git. Code has essentially been forked; added in `jackson-databind` when 3 java8 modules' code was embedded in `ObjectMapper`. Indeed. I never claimed it would...

> > > Only manually tho, not via git. Code has essentially been forked; added in `jackson-databind` when 3 java8 modules' code was embedded in `ObjectMapper`. > > > >...

> [@cdprete](https://github.com/cdprete) Implemented this for `jackson-databind` 3.1(.0), see: [FasterXML/jackson-databind#5519](https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/5519) (PR [FasterXML/jackson-databind#5520](https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/pull/5520)). Thanks @cowtowncoder. I'll give it a try once I've the chance to update our applications to Spring Boot 4.x.