Carleton Coffrin

Yes that is correct. I personally have not thought deeply about what the best power flow formulation would be in the presence of switch data. I expect they would introduce...

I am open to dropping this after some thought. It is worth double checking the findings of, https://github.com/lanl-ansi/PowerModels.jl/issues/353 with the latest version of JuMP. The key code to look at...

> And if the solver doesn't support the objective, it automatically introduces the auxiliary variable... Yes, I tested this when I was exploring, https://github.com/lanl-ansi/PowerModels.jl/issues/353, but the performance was much worse...

Right now the LPAC model is only supported for OPF. In this example you are running PF. I will leave this issue open to explore how this could be supported...

I though of a reasonable workaround for this issue. If you would like to solve a PF problem with a formulation that does not currently support PF you can instead...

I am not sure I fully follow the issue but here is a possibly misguided thought. Is there a way for the user of PowerModels to direct jump to implement...

This would be a welcome addition, please make a PR. The name `calc_basic_lodf_matrix` sounds right to me. I personally don't know the definition of LODF off the top of my...

I think this one was basically, "make some debug logging that is useful for debugging", what should go in there? I am not sure at this point. Starting with `#...

I suspect things will mostly work switches, but I did not think deeply about it. I put that note in the readme to reflect that nothing has been tested with...

Can you adapt one of the test network datasets to exhibit the issue so that we can make a test for this?