Eric NICOLAS

Results 23 comments of Eric NICOLAS

As a fellow forker/unanswered-PR-author, I also would be in favour of having it managed by the community. I have enough time and enthusiasm to keep it working, and I would...

Alternatively, we may just set up a simple GitHub organisation that owns this repo/a fork, it's a little bit more formal but doesn't cost anything and has the advantages of...

Hey guys 👋, This is my first contribution to the Flight Manual, and even one of my very firsts, globally. I did read through the contributing guidelines, but I may...

@Ben3eeE Thanks for the review! 🙇 I agree with your points, I've been a little light on the details 😶. Actually, in my version – Atom version **1.32.0** (latest) w/...

Nevermind me, there's a [procedure](https://github.com/atom/github/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) for using the nightly version of the package. Sorry about that!

Thanks @Ben3eeE ! I decided to use Atom beta 🙂. I can confirm Atom beta ships (today) with `atom/[email protected]`, which **does** have the changes to "Undo Discard" merged in. I...

Yeah, maybe it's not unexpected 😶. After all, I originally thought it was intended that way (even though I wasn't expecting it); but I can't know for sure: The Flight...

Looks like the Travis build failed there (stating line 804): > - ./output/behind-atom/sections/configuration-api/index.html > * External link https://atom.io/docs/api/latest/CompositeDisposable failed: 404 No error > - ./output/upgrading-to-1-0-apis/sections/upgrading-your-package/index.html > * External link https://atom.io/docs/api/latest/Disposable...

+1 Kinda feels bad, flooding the thread just to say "+1". Does anybody know whether the 👍 reaction to the issue would work just as well as dropping a "+1"...

I'm not sure it can actually be directly handled by clever typings from `neverthrow`, but you could get away with specifically returning a `Result` instead of `Ok | Err`: See...