cc-stjm
cc-stjm
> > > Actually one more thing just popped in my mind, that would make this better: the only reason I skip tests at all is `B101`, which probably should...
See also #346 - B101 in tests is a big pain.
A use case I have would be for some string operations. A common pattern we have for resource names is "(current-git-branch)-(resource-specific-suffix)". These can get quite long, and sometimes long branch...
I'd be interested in this feature too - if doing it in templates is the correct way to do it, could we have a demo? I do worry that there...
I was using python-semantic-release 8.7.0
@codejedi365 you mentioned you were looking at some updates in this area, did you finish that work?
Commit Parser has the ability to say "ignore this commit" for the purposes of building the changelog
I think a work around is to hardcode the changelog / release templates to ignore these commits (either based on the type, or based on a new property you add...
Commit Parser has the ability to say "ignore this commit" for the purposes of building the changelog
> It worries me when you said the ignored commits "still" appear in the changelog because that sounds like a bug? I don't think I can call it a bug,...
Commit Parser has the ability to say "ignore this commit" for the purposes of building the changelog
Given the recent commits, it feels like this should not be marked as stale?
In case it helps, I've found that calling `machine.get_graph(force_new=True)` to obtain the graph means it will pick up anything that has changed.