Christian Bölling

https://github.com/oborel/obo-relations/issues/633 might be of interest in this context as well.

I have difficulty understanding the proposed definition. What does "groups the specifically dependent continuant(s)" mean? Can examples be provided that illustrate the intent of the proposed relation?

> > two different workshops to discuss it. @rdmpage gave a great presentation on why LSIDs suck, DOIs suck and PURLs suck (I think those were the three -- I...

> > > The challenge is to make sure you have 1-3, once you have that then the actual identifier technology doesn't matter so much (but of course, some have...

> 2. Why doesn't TDWG simply require a specific (non-pipe) delimiter when defining multiple values per term? Surely this character-based standard would _greatly_ increase data interoperability. Struggling with pipe characters...