Ryan

No, because it doesn't work

@cplee, i appreciate any thoughts you have on this

> * missing error checks - agreed...do you have an example in mind? This would be a great first issue if folks are interested in helping That probably was me...

I have an idea of how to make it work without major refactor, by using waitgroups, but I'm not yet able to test/make that happen due to lack of time....

@cplee Hi, could you re-open this issue, please? I think it's something good to track and eventually work on

Currently it's not possible to limit how many parallel jobs/workflows run.

#823 adds basic support for limiting concurrency, it does not behave like GitHub but it should not spawn hellish amounts of containers/jobs :)

This PR is almost complete, the only thing missing is that it breaks after fixing job context

dummy 1 and 2 are fixed by #726 dummy 3: your image needs nodeJS installed to work properly

Oh okay, I looked at workflow now and unfortunately, that's something I've yet to fix since GitHub mounts all tools into containers and we kind of do too but we...