Fred Snyder

I'll go ahead and merge this and make the changes to pass the two additional specs. It'll be released in 0.47.0.

The best option is probably to add a custom `Convention` through a plugin. I'm currently working on a similar solution to improve Rails support. The bad news is that proper...

Confirmed. I suspect this needs to be registered as a server capability, but Solargraph doesn't currently support it. I'll look into adding it.

I assume you're opening a file that looks like this: ```ruby a = [] a. ``` The trailing `.` is a syntax error. The parser can't tokenize invalid code, so...

Can you tell me how it breaks? This code seems to behave as expected for me with Solargraph 0.45.0: ```ruby a = 1 b = 2 c = {a:, b:}...

Thanks for the example. I'm not surprised that `foo(bar:, baz:)` doesn't show up in a scan, because `solargraph scan` mostly checks return values on methods and variables, not arguments to...

Based on your output, it definitely seems like the parser is treating that line as a syntax error. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to reproduce the problem using Solargraph 0.45.0...

Thanks! Sorbet came to my attention a few months ago. Glad to see they've started open-sourcing it. A relationship between Sorbet and Solargraph is definitely a possibility. Some of the...

@amake It definitely makes sense to support RBS if/when it becomes part of the Ruby standard, but I'm still not sure what form it should take. A few considerations: -...

This was an issue that arose with Travis CI builds a while ago. Someone from Travis suggested removing `cache: bundler`, and that fixed it. I'm not sure what the root...