Casper Beyer
Casper Beyer
This was resolved, intermediate versions of the server allowed this behavior, it is no longer allowed by the server.
> Can you point to the similar code in nats.js? @wallyqs see https://github.com/nats-io/nats.js/blob/747c3e58e65369bb7ad7dfd58d263f8335e465f8/obj/src/objectstore.ts#L838-L844 > It's a breaking change, as it changes the behaviour. We might be better off with a...
I'll open another PR with `updates_only`.
Looked over this a few times over the past weeks but conflicted about the somewhat large surface area it covers (sort of feels like it should be its own package)....
Yeah so since this doesn't actually touch anything in the nats package, I've been thinking to turn this into its own namespace package as I have multiple pending pull requests...
Started to clean this up over in https://github.com/nats-io/nats.py/pull/740 but I just have to ask, is this AI generated @arnavdas88? Some problematic patterns that became immediately apparent when starting to clean...
Did anyone interested in this evaluate https://pypi.org/project/nats-jwt for this purpose, and if so what where did you find it fall short?
Maybe the route to go with this is to lend a hand over there, looks like they've gotten pretty far.
- Made nats-server private, for the time being (possibly indefinitely). - Got a draft adding the full matrix, but can't get mail parser to actually run #750
Sounds like https://github.com/nats-io/nats-architecture-and-design/blob/main/adr/ADR-22.md would resolve this?