Francesco Casella

> You saying "should be something like" implies to me that you're not totally sure about the specifics, yourself. I meant I didn't put too much effort in making a...

Of course this is based on the assumption that `nom` is the nominal value of variable v, i.e., its order of magnitude.

@beutlich do you have a clear idea about how to proceed now?

@beutlich I'm trying to figure out the code you pointed out https://github.com/modelica-tools/csv-compare/blob/18b309dcd0b510abd2a911ed6fcd82245a80aa32/Modelica_ResultCompare/CurveCompare/TubeSize.cs#L99-L132 but I'm not familiar with it. The first question is: what is the difference between `SetStandardBaseAndRatio()` and `SetFormerBaseAndRatio()`...

I have no idea how this code actually works in detail, but to me the case is quite clear. The "former" code, which according to @beutlich is the one that...

BTW, if `SetStandardBaseAndRatio()` is actually not used and is thus dead code, we should probably remove it, or at least write that in the comment.

Discussion during the MAP-LIB meeting Sep 10: go ahead with #67, get @GallLeo to compile it and use it for the new regression testing, and keep MAP-LIB in the loop.

> But we interpret it to mean that they must be type compatible as defined in 6.7, which states that the records must have the same named elements. I also...

Sounds good, it should also work in OMC. BTW, you should be able to skip the `{1}` input, as the `setState_pTX` function has a default input value `reference_X` for it.

OK. Ultimately which base class you pick is up to you. This ticket was just to point out that the currently declared classes are replaceable in name only, but you...