Carsten Bauer

Just to be a little bit more precise, one can currently do ```julia @with_kw type P a=1 b=2 c=a+3b end ``` but a user will be able to overwrite the...

I'm not sure I understand, could you elaborate?

I see that this could be used to hide the field `c` from the user. But wouldn't the `@with_kw` macro still need to know that it should exclude a field...

AFAIU we want two features: 1) Be able to specify a property (not a real field) which when called by `A.b` will (on-the-fly) calculate it's value based on the current...

IMO, isotopes and their properties could be added. The main author has also indicated that he is positive about it in the linked discourse thread. As always, the best way...

Yeah, maybe it's just me and indexing is fine here. @rahulkp220 What's your opinion on this?

@Gregstrq Can you please add some tests? @anandijain Good question why CI didn't run... it [should](https://github.com/JuliaPhysics/PeriodicTable.jl/blob/master/.github/workflows/CI.yml#L4)?! @rahulkp220 any idea / can you take care of this?

A first comment: a potential disadvantage of this would be that the package wouldn't be as light weight any more. Generally speaking, I would recommend to only add dependencies to...

Also note that python has https://github.com/pkienzle/periodictable which seems to store the information in regular dictionaries (no databases involved).

First of all, thanks for the PR! However, I fail to see the actual advantage of having a dedicated `getlist` given that one can just use basic Julia features (broadcasting,...