Carlos Duarte

Similar approach in a different rule is going on on #1916

@WilcoFiers Wouldn't a solution similar to what was done in #1920 work for this rule also?

Resolution from CG meeting: deprecate this rule

> > @Jym77 @carlosapaduarte, > > What are your thoughts on adding this into the agenda items, if @bobbytung and @JediLin are able to join? > > Yes, definitely. @bobbytung...

CG: can you document any accessibility support issues related to passed example 8 before we merge this?

@tombrunet could you try to prepare a PR so that we can discuss the best way to do this and move on from there?

@ajanec01 we're finally getting to discuss this in CG meetings! Would you be able to rerun [your tests](https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1615#issuecomment-858800969) with updated versions of the voice assistants you used originally?

From CG meeting: we need to update the definition of programmatically determined context

Call for review ended. Merging...

From the [CG call](https://www.w3.org/2023/02/09-act-r-minutes.html#t06): redo the tests to determine what is the current level of support, considering as much combinations of UA/AT as possible. If UA are handling case sensitivity...