Carlos Duarte

Superseded by #1951

Get input on this from the TF: https://www.w3.org/2021/09/23-act-r-minutes.html#item04

@WilcoFiers is this been taking care of in the new website?

We're leaving this one open, and revisit when we have an update on how to employ states in ACT rules (ACT rule format 1.1?)

Summary from CG discussion: - the rule assumes that links with the same accessible name and context are not ambiguous to users in general. But how often if that the...

Discussed in the CG: the group agrees to drop the "no widgets" condition. Add an assumption about the state the rule is checked in (no changes to the page or...

If I recall correctly the reasoning behind that example is the following: - the "menu" role has a "group" role to meet the required owned elements condition - but the...

This is considering ARIA 1.1 When we move to ARIA 1.2 then we will need to update this example because the "menuitem" role will work.

Discuss possible solution with CG: - Clarify that it needs to move away forward (using unmodified keys). Add expectation that if you're only able to move away with modified keys...

Resolution: - update example 1 to ensure it works everywhere - clarify that it only needs to be able to move away from the trap, irrespectively of moving forward or...