Carlo Cabrera

Running the binary fails with ``` dyld[95921]: Library not loaded: '@rpath/lib_InternalSwiftSyntaxParser.dylib' Referenced from: '/opt/homebrew/Cellar/swift-format/0.50700.0/bin/swift-format' Reason: tried: '/usr/lib/swift/lib_InternalSwiftSyntaxParser.dylib' (no such file), '/opt/homebrew/Cellar/swift-format/0.50700.0/bin/lib_InternalSwiftSyntaxParser.dylib' (no such file), '/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/lib/swift-5.5/macosx/lib_InternalSwiftSyntaxParser.dylib' (no such file), '/usr/lib/swift/lib_InternalSwiftSyntaxParser.dylib' (no...

Python libraries that can be used in multiple formulae are ok by me.

> The only condition is that these formulae need to have Python 3.8, 3.9 and 3.10 as build and test dependencies, to be able to use them in a mixed...

The line I would draw is: - can be used in multiple formulae (and, correspondingly, dependents should not have overly strict version requirements for the dependency we want to make...

Can we try a better test beyond just `import`?

Sorry, too many PRs to look at there. Should be merged soon.

`gupnp-tools` seems to not be compatible with the new `gupnp`/`gssdp`.

@Bo98 what do you think about using `CLANG_RESOURCE_DIR` to get rid of the minor and/or patch versions from that path, so we don't need to keep rebuilding `ccls`?

``` ==> brew audit ccls --online --git --skip-style ==> FAILED ccls: * 0.20220729 is not a GitHub pre-release but 'ccls' is in the GitHub prerelease allowlist. ``` We might need...

> > We might need to ship a pre-release again in the future, though. > > > > How often does that actually happen? Do we ship every prerelease? It...