Carl Mastrangelo
Carl Mastrangelo
@marcoferrer would using two `PerfMark.event` calls work using a tag? I know it's not as clean, but you could still make some sense of how long the "start" and "stop"...
@marcoferrer If `io.perfmark.impl.Storage` were pluggable, it could provide the correctly scoped (thread, coroutine, etc.) MarkHolder. The most serious issue with this is that there is a cost to providing this...
Let me think about how to do it. Putting a few thoughts down: * Each thread assumes it's the only writer so having an external thread try to touch the...
@atalbayrak want to send a PR?
Guava might have to face this sooner than we do, so they may make their futures Completable anyways, and you could just cast. gRPC *could* just ride this out.
The reason for the split is to keep the dependencies down for grpc-context. 1. Merging won't work. It would add the dependencies back in. 2. Same reason. 3. This is...
@adriancole the issue isn't that it's in the io.grpc realm, its that the same package is split over multiple jars. Making grpc-context contain io.grpc.context.Context would solve this.
I think this is because the title was messed up, and so github just changed it to the modified date of the file.
Hi, I don't think I can answer this question, and it's unlikely to be seen by anyone who can. You might try asking on StackOverflow, or our official forum: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/grpc-io
cc: @dapengzhang0