caribouW3

For the record https://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/ has a number of tools working from tr.rdf input, so we should probably keep it, at least until we have a proper replacement for each of...

> @caribouW3 - Abin is working on Render Blocking signal in Resource Timing. Can we add him as an Invited Expert? No objection from my perspective. (https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/webperf/instructions)

> and dropping the levels whereever we can. I think we can consider that the [CfC](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2021Apr/0006.html) is over, and then publish the CRs (they need transition requests, it's an opportunity...

Wide review not completed, so transition requests are still stuck

Could you be more specific on what you mean by "it makes no sense in NT's context", since TAO plays a role for workerStart, [w3c/navigation-timing#118](https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/118) The suggested flag would apply...

Indeed, I had missed the clarification in issue [100](w3c/navigation-timing/issues/100). So that would add workerStart to the list in [117](w3c/navigation-timing/issues/117) I suppose.

Depends on https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/337

Are we in situation 2. b described here: https://github.com/w3c/Guide/blob/master/process/non-participant-commitment.md I think that if it's a one-time contribution, a non-participant commitment is enough (Contributor needs a W3C public account, link it...

It's similar to the User Timing case, it's in CR now, do we need a CR draft or a CR snapshot?

@chaals Right, it does not cover work under simple CLA, only the Patent Policy. (BTW I'm no longer maintainer/systeam)