Nick Carboni

The ppc64le runs are still 50-100% slower than the x86 ones. Was this supposed to fix that issue or just make them work? Basically the same concerns as https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/19689#issuecomment-605289260

As an example we use `dumb-init` in the ManageIQ project containers. ref: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-pods/blob/gaprindashvili/images/miq-app/Dockerfile#L110-L114 There isn't an rpm, but it's easy enough to use from source.

@agrare Does https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/19536 solve the worker definitions bullet or is that more complicated?

For what it's worth, we're building that package in our project's COPR repo here https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/manageiq/ManageIQ-Master/package/ruby-install/ @simaishi was that particularly difficult to build out? Do you think we could take on...

I think the problem is that no changes are necessary to either the source or the spec file so we don't need to push a PR. Additionally, it seems like...

We would be more than happy to maintain a copr project to build fedora and EL packages for chruby and ruby-install as we have to build them anyway, but if...

>Since we do not support in-place upgrades for images greater than centos7 Out of curiosity, why was this dropped? Seems like a rather large feature to remove.

Looks like the docs at least were removed in https://github.com/sclorg/postgresql-container/pull/489/commits/e773fe833d57d8df51dfbdfed355d62e185ff2ff @hhorak do you have more details around why in-place upgrade was removed? Would something like @eifrach's patch be adaquate to...

Yes, I think breaking it out into its own repo would be best so we don't have to deal with more local modules and so that it can be easily...

I think we should be able to safely scale httpd, that just needs to be tested. Maybe we just remove the replica bit from reconcile to let the user set...